The Qur'an states that the Prophet Muhammad (born in Mecca, April 20, 570 - died in Medina, June 8, 632) was khatamaniyinin (the last prophet), but the Ahmadiyya raised Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (Qadian, Punjab, India, 1835 - died May 26, 1908) as a prophet.
More than that, the Qur'an says laa raiba fiih (there is no doubt at all in this Qur'an) but Shi'ites doubt the purity of the Qur'an. Until Tajul Muluk the Shi'a frontman from Sampang Madura was sentenced to 4 years in prison for being proven to blaspheme religion, violating article 156A of the Criminal Code, because he considered the Qur'an no longer pure. Then Tajul Muluk must undergo a sentence of 4 years in prison. The decision was contained in an excerpt from the Supreme Court's (Supreme Court) decision with Number 1787 K / Pid / 2012 sent by the Supreme Court to the Sampang District Court (PN) dated January 9, 2013.
Strangely, some people still think that the heretics are only the Sampang Shiites. The other is not, the reason is because the Central MUI has not yet issued a misguided fatwa for Shia, despite recommendations (MUI 1984 and 2014) about alerting the Shia; and the MUI issued a MUI Handbook to Know and Be Wary of Shia Diversion in Indonesia.
The view of some people who dodged that there is still a mu'tadilah (moderate) shia that is often heralded by certain figures (who do not want to be blamed as Shi'a presses but smells of aromas that benefit the Shiites) have in fact been denied by the fact that the defenders speak in the framework "Save" Tajul Muluk, the Shia leader of Sampang Madura who has been proven to tarnish Islam, considers the Qur'an to be impure.
Those who speak out in defense of the heresy of Shia (which in fact actually proves that the heretical are not only the Shia of Madura, but in Indonesia in general) include:
Jalaluddin Rakhmat with his concoons from IJABI (Association of Indonesian Jamaah Ahlul Bait) even supported by homeless female Musdah Mulia defender Musdah Mulia defended the Shia Sampang by "attacking" the MUI in a dialogue on Kompas TV Monday night (16/9 2013).
Shia supporters defended the other sampiah shia, the well-known Haddad Alwipenyanyi who used to duet with Sulis. One of his songs, entitled Ya Thoybah, was changed in Arabic and contains excessive praise to Ali ibn Abi Talib (a characteristic of the Shi'ah). During his visit to the Shia refugees in Sampang, 29/9/2012, he (Haddad Alwi) said "Nobody wants to go to heaven without being tested, the Messenger of Allah is not far from us, and don't doubt that Allah does not love us. The suffering of the Apostles is heavier than our tests. "
Heydar Baqir, the publishing house boss Mizan who wrote in the Republika newspaper spread his misguided notion that the Qur'an experienced tahrif (that is, a change of text from the original, after the Prophet sallalahu ‘alayhi wa sallam died). Regarding Haidar Bagir and Al-Tahrif Al-Qur'an's Allegations, Contains accusations regarding the existence of TAHRIF Al-Qur'an (changes in text from the original), that the Surah Al Ahzab was originally read 200 verses. But then only 73 verses remained (or about 127 verses missing). It was stated in the opinion article in Republika, 27 January 2012 edition, Dr. Haidar Bagir wrote the article entitled, "Once Again, Shia and Harmony of the Ummah".
Then how to answer opinions like the above?
The existence of one or two narrations that say this and that, outside the mainstream understanding of the scholars, should not be taken for granted. Must be done tash-hih (penshahihan) first, whether the history is authentic or not. Reports that say there has been a change to the Qur'an, on average not accepted. Because of the reason:
(a) Contrary to Surah Al Hijr verse 9, that Allah revealed the Qur'an and He also guarded it; (b) Contrary to stronger narrations, that the Qur'an is perfect, unchanged; (c) Contrary to Ijma 'of the Muslims since the time of the Prophet and the Friends, to this day. For this reason, from the perspective of Dirayah (the substance of the hadith), the hadiths that explain the existence of Tahrif are rejected. In the science of hadith, a hadith that contradicts certainty with stronger narrations, it is rejected. [Abah Aisha, Fatima, Khadijah].
With the support of Shi'ite leaders against Tajul Muluk who considered the Qur'an no longer pure, and it turned out that the case had been proven legitimate through the court up to the Supreme Court level, it was evident that the Shia were defiling religion. And it is not only the Shia Madura Sampang, but it is the Shia in IndonThis essay, with evidence of Shi'ite leaders in various places, also supports the Shi'a leader Tajul Muluk who tainted the religion.
Deception of the Qur'an clearly damages Islam. Faced with all Muslims. So it is very strange, if someone, especially Islamic leaders, is still soft and even defends the Shi'ah. That is very strange. Even have to be responsible in the hereafter, facing the terrible threat of the torment of hell.
The threat of torture is very hard
It must be realized really, lying about the word of Allah Ta'ala is very dangerous for those who say it, it can even be dangerous for others who are affected by it. Then it is natural that the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam threatened to go to hell for people who only because he said one word.
حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه: أنه سمع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول إن العبد ليتكلم بالكلمة ينزل بها في النار أبعد ما بين المشرق والمغرب.
Narrated from Abu Hurairah r.a, he said: I have heard the Prophet s.a.w say: Sometimes a servant says one sentence (one word) which causes him to slip into Hell whose distance is the distance between east and west. (Hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari and Muslim).
عن أبي هريرة قال قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إن الرجل ليتكلم بالكلمة لا يرى بها بأسا يهوي بها سبعين خريفا في النار قال هذا حديث حسن غريب من هذا الوجه *.
From Abu Hurairah, he said; The Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa Salam said:" Surely someone might say a word that he thinks is okay, but with him actually slip in hellfire for seventy seasons. " (HR At-Tirmidhi, he said this hadith hasan gharib from this direction, and Ahmad - 6917).
Regarding defenders of false prophets (also exposed to those who defend followers of false prophets, such as defending Ahmadiyah in essence defending false prophets as well), in the Musnad Al-Humaidi it is reported:
1230- حدثنا الحميدى قال حدثنا سفيان قال حدثنا عمران بن ظبيان عن رجل من بنى حنيفة أنه سمعه يقول قال لى أبو هريرة: أتعرف رجالا? قُلْتُ: نَعَمْ. قَالَ: فَإِنِّى سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- يَقُولُ: «ضِرْسُهُ فِى النَّارِ أَعْظَمُ مِنْ ٍسٍٍُُُُُُُ فَكَانَ أَسْلَمَ ثُمَّ ارْتَدَّ وَلَحِقَ بِمُسَيْلِمَةَ. ) مسند الحميدي - مكنز - (3/409) (
From Imran bin Dhabyan from a man from the Bani Hanifah (tribe whose false prophet, Musailimah Al-Kadzdzab) that he heard it, he said, Abu Hurairah said to me: Do you know (a man named) Rajjal? I answered: yes. He (Abu Hurairah) said: Verily I have heard the Messenger of Allaah ‘alayhi wa sallam said:" His molars (Ar-Rajjal) in hell are bigger than Mount Uhud ". He used to convert to Islam then apostatize and join the Musailimah (false Prophet). (Musnad Al-Humaidi).
The defenders of false prophets were threatened with hell's torment. Including the defenders of Ahmadiyah is essentially a defender of false prophets, because Ahmadis are followers of the false prophet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
Saef bin Umar narrated from Thulaihah from Ikrimah from Abu Hurairah he said, "One day I sat next to the Messenger of Allah with a group of people, in the middle of us present Ar-Rajjal bin Anfawah. The Prophet said,
إن فيكم لرجلا ضِرْسُهُ فِى النَّارِ أَعْظَمُ مِنْ أُحُدٍ
"Surely among you there is someone whose molars in hell are bigger than Mount Uhud."
Then I (Abu Hurairah) noticed that all who had been present had died, and all that remained was me and Ar-Rajjal. I was so afraid of being the person mentioned by the Prophet that finally Ar-Rajjal came out following Musailimah and confirmed his prophethood. Indeed the slander of Ar-Rajjal is greater than the slander caused by Musailimah. "This was narrated by Ibn Is-haq from his teacher, from Abu Hurairah ra. . Al-Kadzdzab).
With this terrible threat, there are also concerns about the loss of faith due to defending Ahmadiyah. An example is the article titled Ahmadi Kafirin Defenders, Should the Bodies of Disholati? (see nahimunkar.com, June 4, 20089: 23 pm, http://www.nahimunkar.com/para-pembela-kafirin-ahmadiyah/#more-77)
Thus the strong threat from the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wasallam regarding people whose words were considered to be okay (even though it is very damaging to religion) then resulted in being plunged into hell with a distance of only 70 years (travel). Who is defending the false prophet, his molars in hell is bigger dcompared to Mount Uhud. How horrified. But now how dare they say things so inconsequentially, only to defend the followers of false prophets and heretics like Shiites and others.
Loading...
0 comments:
Post a Comment